Welcome to the Home of the 6.8 SPC - 68forums.com.

Advertise Here
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Myrtle Beach, SC
    Posts
    918

    Default

    If I'm going to buy a Tipton rod and Lucas bore guide which rod size should I get? Can I buy a .22 to .26 and use it in both 5.56 and 6.8 bores or do I need the .27 to .45 for the 6.8?

    Also what is the best length rod to get with 16" barrels?
    NRA Life Member

  2. #12
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    105

    Default

    I am a novice, but I asked Mike Lucas - Lucas Bore Guides and he said the .22 to .26 should be fine for 6.8. The length of rod I ordered was 36" which should be Ok, because the bore guide is about 8" long or so.

    With respect to the bore guide, you can buy one for 5.56 and one for 6.8, and only buy one insert for the rod that will work in both bore guides. That will save you a bit.

    Again, you will want to get some expert opinion, like I was trying to do. I sent the rod back. I shouldn't have to deal with a rod that was curved from the start.
    Freedom isn't free. Thank you to all the soldiers who have served our country.

  3. #13

    Default

    That is true. I always try to buy my rods in-person which is not always possible. When I do I always roll them on a flat surface to check if they are out of round

  4. #14
    6.8 SPC Fan
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    252

    Default

    This was re-posted on a local gun site and the product recommendations are SUPER helpful. Just wanted to say thanks for your research!
    "Capitalization is the difference between helping your uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse." -angsniper

    United States Army Infantryman -'04 to Present
    OIF and OEF vet
    http://militarysignatures.com/signatures/member11851.png

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bossier City, LA
    Posts
    6,800

    Default

    [QUOTE=Hammered[/QUOTE]

    Reported as spam

  6. #16
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NH some of the time...
    Posts
    7,532

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EWP View Post
    Reported as spam
    You beat me... that is what happens when I go have lunch
    Molṑn Labé
    http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Roberts.pdf
    "I figure we are gunman because we are better then most, and it beats branding cows or digging copper" -Appaloosa
    Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property... Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.-Thomas Paine

  7. #17
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    646

    Default

    Let me get this right. To break-in a new barrel, one must follow the break-in regimine which often involves shooting one shot, cleaning and repeatinig this process for 5 to 10 shots, then shoot maybe 3 shots for 5 times and cleaning between each 3 shot session. So lets add up the time to break-in a barrel.

    Shoot one shot (3 seconds, 4 if you slow down for a six pack of beer)
    Clean - About 12 minutes

    Repeat 5 times equals one hour of cleaning. If 10 shots, then two hours of cleaning.

    Shoot string of three shots (15 seconds because you're slow)
    Clean - About 12 minutes

    Repeat 5 times equals another hour of cleaning.

    So, at minimum you'll need two to three hours of cleaning time to break-in the barrel. Now all this assumes one can have such an environment and equipemnt and table and space that facilitates cleaning at the range. If not, then you'd have to take the gun home between shots and clean it there. Wow! Has anyone else ever considered the implications of these procedures in the real world?

    Daniel
    Daniel
    Alexandria, Va

  8. #18
    68Forums.com lifer
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Corona, CA
    Posts
    4,953

    Default

    Considering most do this procedure lovingly of their new high end barrel. I'm sure they've thought about that little labor of love and done it. I've done it in the past and it wasn't a huge issue. Nice stress free day at the range away from the kids weeeee.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #19
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NH some of the time...
    Posts
    7,532

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel View Post
    Wow! Has anyone else ever considered the implications of these procedures in the real world?

    Daniel
    Yup I do it to mine all the time, our DDM's do it to the issued guns when they first get them....

    it may take a little bit but if it helps smooth things out then its worth it...
    Molṑn Labé
    http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Roberts.pdf
    "I figure we are gunman because we are better then most, and it beats branding cows or digging copper" -Appaloosa
    Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property... Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.-Thomas Paine

  10. #20
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    646

    Default Good way to look at it.

    Quote Originally Posted by sfsmedic View Post
    Considering most do this procedure lovingly of their new high end barrel. I'm sure they've thought about that little labor of love and done it. I've done it in the past and it wasn't a huge issue. Nice stress free day at the range away from the kids weeeee.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I've never followed the "break-in" procedures with such attention. I still have sub 1/2 inch groups in both 6.8 rifles. From a theoretical perspective, these "break-in" procedures seem to be predicated upon and relegated to a concatenated structure of theory (a collection of observations with lots of antidotal evidence in support and in refutation and no means of empirical testing). No one can prove it works because each event (barrel cleaning and all other intervening and spurious variables that can be conjured up) is a singularity and can't be "done over" again to test the idea that the "break-in" is producing the results. A diachronic comparison couldn't be performed for the same reason.

    Daniel
    Daniel
    Alexandria, Va


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •