Welcome to the Home of the 6.8 SPC - 68forums.com.

Advertise Here
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29
  1. #1
    6.8 Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    85

    Default 6.8 SPC Magazine Review

    Greetings again.
    I've got a few different 6.8 SPC magazines on hand for an un-biased review. The mags being reviewed are the Bushmaster 25rd 6.8 SPC magazine, Barrett 30rd 6.8 SPC magazine, PRi 25-rd 6.8 SPC magazine, and C-Products 25rd 6.8 SPC magazine.



    Out of these four magazines, the hardest finish is a toss-up between the Barrett magazine and the C-Products magazine. The PRi is the runner-up with the Bushmaster trailing behind. The Bushmaster magazine finish is comparable to the USGI anodizing which can be scratched with a finger nail. After a few reloads the finish starts to wear through and look shiny. As far as glare goes, the Barrett and C-Prod reflect the most light. Between the PRi and the Bushmaster I feel that the Bushmaster has more 'sheen' since the PRi has a somewhat metallic finish and the waffle shape breaks up the glare. Between the Barrett and C-Prod, the C-Prod has more of a satin finish so it has less 'sheen' than the Barrett. Notice the difference of the mag catch cut-outs in the various magazines pictured. The C-Products mag catch cut-out is ramped on both sides, this makes for a very positive mag catch engagement with an audible click as the catch finds the recess.



    As for the welds and feed mouths, its easy to see PRi is the clear winner. There are no visible welds or seams at this junction, and the PRi has the lowest feed mouth of any mags pictured. The Bushmaster is the worst with the highest feed mouth, and it occasionally got caught up on case mouths while feeding.



    The welds on the back show that the C-Products magazine appears to be the most sloppily constructed. Some of the spot welds are raised up, the steel seams show wrinkling, and the mag has noticable flex when squeezed with your fingers. The C-Products magazine also exhibits the greatest distance between the feed lips, though I'm uncertain of what effect it has on function.



    As for the followers, you can see that the Bushmaster and C-Products followers and mag bodies are essentially identical. If you look at the feed lips they both show a 3-steps down shape in their side profile picture. Both mag bodies are marked 'SS' for stainless steel. Their floorplates are identical which you will see in the next picture. However, if you look at the seams inside the magazine, the RED ARROW shows that the C-Products magazine seam is not pinched flat like the others. This is what prevented this magazine from seating the 2.3" OAL cartridges. I am uncertain if this occured while shipping or if the mags left C-Products in this condition. Both magazines I received showed this issue. If their mag bodies are in fact identical to the Bushmaster mag body, then a properly constructed C-Products magazine should feed the 2.3" OAL cartridges with no issue.
    The advantage to the PRi magazine body is in its construction--this juncture has no welded seams so using a thicker metal still achieves a greater I.D. over the welded seam construction of the other magazines.



    These are the floorplates. You can see the similarity between Bushmaster and C-Products floorplates. To remove these plates for mag cleaning/maintenance, you need to bend the tab at the bottom up enough and use a flat-tip screwdriver to pry the floorplate away from the magazine. The Barrett floorplate tab all the way on the left is different in that the tab is bent into the magazine body--I'm unsure of how this one is disassembled. The PRi magazine is the easiest to disassemble, it uses a locking plate underneath the floorplate which can be depressed with a bullet tip, then the floorplate slides right out.

    The overall feel of the magazines gave favor to the Barrett magazine followed by the PRi magazine. They do not rattle when empty or loaded, and feel solid. The Bushmaster and C-Products magazines felt the flimsiest and rattled when empty or loaded. The Barrett's steel follower felt the slickest out of all the magazines I tested. The Bushmaster magazine with the brown follower was the runner up, followed by the C-Products magazine and the PRi magazine was the worst. The PRi mag was the most difficult to load in that I encountered some binding when I did my capacity tests.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For my testing I used 2 magazines of each type. My first test was to see what the maximum capacity of the magazines were and at what capacity they could be seated under a closed bolt carrier with ease. Here are the results:

    Bushmaster: Holds 26 rounds. Could not easily insert mag on closed bolt carrier until 23 round capacity.
    Barrett: Holds 30 rounds. Could not easily insert mag on closed bolt carrier until 25 round capacity.
    PRi: Holds 26 rounds. Could not easily insert mag on closed bolt carrier until 23 round capacity.
    C-Products: Holds 26 rounds. Could not easily insert mag on closed bolt carrier until 25 round capacity--which is what its advertised as holding.

    C-Products is the only mag that passes the capacity test in that it can be loaded on a closed bolt with its advertised capacity.


    My second test was to see which magazines could tolerate ammunition with a maximum OAL of 2.3".



    Bushmaster passes the test, in this picture it is holding 10 rounds of 130gr SBPT @ 2.3" OAL.



    PRi passes the test, in this picture it is holding the same 10 rounds of 130gr SBPT @ 2.3" OAL.



    C-Products mags would not hold the rounds, in the picture you can see the meplat of the 1st round is hung up on the seam in the front of the mag body.



    Barrett mags would not hold the rounds either, you can see the meplats hung up in the same fashion as the C-Products magazines.


    As far as feeding goes, all mags fed fine with the exception of the Bushmaster. The Bushmaster magazine had a tendency to catch case mouths so its probability for jams was higher than the rest. The Barrett magazine undoubtedly fed the best followed by the C-Products magazine. The PRi mags have the most follower friction inside the mags than any other tested.

    As far as loading goes, the Barrett was by far the easiest to load, followed by the C-Products, Bushmaster, then PRi.

    Thats all for now,

  2. #2
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle (IC Zmbz)
    Posts
    16,025

    Default

    Thanks for that. much appreciated.
    http://www.68forums.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=12308&dateline=1269311358 Make yourselves sheep, and the wolves will eat you. -Benjamin Franklin
    NRA Life Member
    Certified Firearms Safety Instructor
    A Gun's Two Biggest Enemies: Rust, and Politicians
    Obama... don't go to Arizona, they require proof of Citizenship.
    Politicians=Diapers: Full of the Same Thing and in Need of Frequent Changing.

    You should SEE how tight my rifle groups single shots !!!

  3. #3
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    835

    Default

    Good work there. should help new people out alot picking out mags. Thanks

  4. #4
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    863

    Wink

    Per your comment "PRi: Holds 26 rounds. Could not easily insert mag on closed bolt carrier until 23 round capacity."

    I have PRI magazines and the one you show is advertised by PRI as a 25 round magazine. I believe your discontent with its ability to hold 26 rounds and then be fully seated may be a result of the 26th round inserted. This last round would seem to consume the available space PRI designed into their magazine as space for compression while inserted into the magazine well.

    Cheers.

    Daniel
    Daniel
    Alexandria, Va

    I make my first mistake everyday just by getting out of bed. After that, the mistakes start to cascade, erupting in a full fledge series of failures by the time I get to lunch. At dinner time, my catastrophes become radioactive and I have to shut down for the rest of the evening to avoid a complete melt down. If it weren’t for my sweet and loving wife, half the world would be missing by bedtime.

  5. #5
    68Forums.com lifer
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,615

    Default

    Excellent review. Very thorough. Thanks!

  6. #6
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle (IC Zmbz)
    Posts
    16,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel View Post
    Per your comment "PRi: Holds 26 rounds. Could not easily insert mag on closed bolt carrier until 23 round capacity."

    I have PRI magazines and the one you show is advertised by PRI as a 25 round magazine. I believe your discontent with its ability to hold 26 rounds and then be fully seated may be a result of the 26th round inserted. This last round would seem to consume the available space PRI designed into their magazine as space for compression while inserted into the magazine well.

    Cheers.

    Daniel
    Me thinks the spirit of his testing/commenting was...

    1. How many rounds would fit in the magazine.
    2. How many rounds in the magazine would allow it to seat with the bolt closed

    Two different tests, fair tests when the same was tried with all magazines, just to see how each performed according to their claims.
    http://www.68forums.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=12308&dateline=1269311358 Make yourselves sheep, and the wolves will eat you. -Benjamin Franklin
    NRA Life Member
    Certified Firearms Safety Instructor
    A Gun's Two Biggest Enemies: Rust, and Politicians
    Obama... don't go to Arizona, they require proof of Citizenship.
    Politicians=Diapers: Full of the Same Thing and in Need of Frequent Changing.

    You should SEE how tight my rifle groups single shots !!!

  7. #7
    6.8 SPC Fan
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    295

    Cool

    Do you think the Bushmaster mag was made by CProducts ?
    The older I get, the better I was.

  8. #8
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Syracuse, Ut
    Posts
    2,583

    Default

    Thanks for the review. Very good read. I think that C-products and Bushmaster magazine is the one in the same but not too sure.

    "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." -- George Washington

    "When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.” John 8:12

  9. #9
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    S.E.Mo.
    Posts
    601

    Default

    Thanks for the review. After reading through this I've come to believe that not only do we need "cheaper" ammo but better quality mags. Ones that can be loaded long for reloaders. Why isn't this possible?

  10. #10
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle (IC Zmbz)
    Posts
    16,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mogunr View Post
    Thanks for the review. After reading through this I've come to believe that not only do we need "cheaper" ammo but better quality mags. Ones that can be loaded long for reloaders. Why isn't this possible?
    The lower receiver mag well is designed for the .223. Between the larger round and a need to fit it (and the mag) into the mag well... ya gotta compromise somewhere.
    http://www.68forums.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=12308&dateline=1269311358 Make yourselves sheep, and the wolves will eat you. -Benjamin Franklin
    NRA Life Member
    Certified Firearms Safety Instructor
    A Gun's Two Biggest Enemies: Rust, and Politicians
    Obama... don't go to Arizona, they require proof of Citizenship.
    Politicians=Diapers: Full of the Same Thing and in Need of Frequent Changing.

    You should SEE how tight my rifle groups single shots !!!


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •