Welcome to the Home of the 6.8 SPC - 68forums.com.

Advertise Here
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30
  1. #1
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    West TX
    Posts
    1,555

    Default is it safe to say....

    that bullets with a tangent ogive usually yeild better accuracy and easier to develope an accurate load for??? even tho they may have lower numbers i think they are a better looking design overall....what do you guys have to say on the matter....well, as far as 6.8 is conserned? i know berger uses secant design, but is more swept back for for sure....



    left hornady 100gr. sp(secant)......right sierra 110 PH(tangent)
    Last edited by dredge; 05-02-2010 at 03:36 PM.

  2. #2

    Default

    BC has nothing to do with accuracy.

  3. #3
    68Forums.com Industry Partner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Roaming
    Posts
    8,830

    Default

    tangent ogives are easier to tune or are more forgiving IMO
    Don't get caught outgunned, step up to the 6.8mm

    3363 hollyridge trail Marietta Ga 30008-- IP 108.209.98.53 --address associated with credit card fraud.

  4. #4
    6.8 SPC Lover
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Monroe, La
    Posts
    545

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dredge View Post
    that bullets with a tangent ogive usually yeild better accuracy and easier to develope an accurate load for??? even tho they may have lower numbers i think they are a better looking design overall....what do you guys have to say on the matter....well, as far as 6.8 is conserned? i know berger uses secant design, but is more swept back for for sure....



    left hornady 100gr. sp(secant)......right sierra 110 PH(tangent)
    I have yet to shoot my 6.8, but IME generally a tangent ogive is much more jump tolerant than a secant ogive. So it really depends on your application, but for a new spec 6.8 a tangent ogive should be a little less picky with jump.

  5. #5
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clear Lake (Houston), TEXAS
    Posts
    876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by constructor View Post
    tangent ogives are easier to tune or are more forgiving IMO
    I am going along with constructor on this one. I plan on holding my hunting range to 300 yards and at that range I agree 100%. If I was playing with a 338 edge and a rock at 1500 yards maybe not, so I agree with this platform.
    I also got my 115 gr. SMKs today to try something different with H322. Also I got my Accu-Shot BT-13 monopod for my Magpul PRS so hopefully my groups will improve. I can foresee an eye problem at work this week.
    Mike Moore
    N5RWH
    NRA# 166336949

  6. #6
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    West TX
    Posts
    1,555

    Default

    i'll have to wait for the range to dry up, but i've shot a ton of sierra bullets without one single problem so i may jst have to stick with them. i jst wish they made 110 or 115 GMK BTHP....

  7. #7
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clear Lake (Houston), TEXAS
    Posts
    876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dredge View Post
    i'll have to wait for the range to dry up, but i've shot a ton of sierra bullets without one single problem so i may jst have to stick with them. i jst wish they made 110 or 115 GMK BTHP....
    Well I would also like to see an 100gr SGK. I know the boat tail does not do much for stability at the "lower" ranges, but I really like the BT for reloading over the flat base. As an off the wall thought would you use a Berger hunting 100 gr. if they had it or one of the proven Barnes? Always fun debate items...
    Later
    Mike Moore
    N5RWH
    NRA# 166336949

  8. #8
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    West TX
    Posts
    1,555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mmmooretx View Post
    Well I would also like to see an 100gr SGK. I know the boat tail does not do much for stability at the "lower" ranges, but I really like the BT for reloading over the flat base. As an off the wall thought would you use a Berger hunting 100 gr. if they had it or one of the proven Barnes? Always fun debate items...
    Later
    i proly would if i had a rifle built for the main purpose of being accurate....like yours mike. if ever i do get into alot of hogs i would also proly make the switch to barnes. i jst can't argue with results and the success many people on this site have had with them...people like HTR, ccoker and bwilson. IMHO i think pretty much any bullet will do the trick on hog if you hit them in the neck. i read somewhere on texas boars i think that a guy put down a pretty big one with a 70gr. NBT out of a .243 to the neck...also read tons about guys using 60gr. nosler partitions in .223's to take out plenty of them along with deer on other sites. i myself wouldn't hesitate to squeeze of on one up to 250lbs using pro hunters. here in west texas deer jst don't get as big as they do up north and so i have to say that pretty much any bullet out of any cal. that isn't designed to frag will do the job...bullets like the barnes varmint grenade, v-max, NBT's and real light JHP's mainly out in varmint cals...like 22-250 and 243 that can really drive them fast. i don't consider the v-max in 6.8 to be like these...however i have to yet try them, but is jst what i've seen and read about them so far. i use 130 & 140 NBT's in my 270wsm, but have yet to take a deer with it since i got it last year...i does have a thicker tapered jacket and is reccomended for hunting, but i jst don't know if it will or will not stay together with a 3300 muzzle velocity. i'm thinking it proly will, but can't say for sure. tht's what i'm mainly gonna deer hunt with tho....hopefully i will find out this winter...i know i'm proly off topic here, but i like to get on here and talk myself....not really have fun debates tho like you say.....but i know those were not your intentions at all......
    Last edited by dredge; 04-19-2010 at 08:42 PM.

  9. #9
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    West TX
    Posts
    1,555

    Default

    mmmoo, i am also real curious to hear how the SMK's are gonna work out for you....that may eventually turn out to be the go to round i choose for my 6.8 spc(now, that's a debatable topic, cuz my go to bullet would be used for everything). i can't help it i jst really like a BTHP and the hornady ones jst look they would be more finikey to find a good load for...but i will find that out soon enough. i also crimped this last batch even tho they didn't have canelure, but hopefully i won't notice as many fliers. i'm really gonna try to exersice some better trigger control too. honestly tho, i'm thinking for shooting targets it would be nice to have a selectable gas block and jst turn off the gas and cycle each round by hand.....H, that maybe someting you could put together pretty easily and i know that would be a good plus if i ever got a piston system.

  10. #10
    68Forums.com Team Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Clear Lake (Houston), TEXAS
    Posts
    876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dredge View Post
    mmmoo, i am also real curious to hear how the SMK's are gonna work out for you....that may eventually turn out to be the go to round i choose for my 6.8 spc(now, that's a debatable topic, cuz my go to bullet would be used for everything). i can't help it i jst really like a BTHP and the hornady ones jst look they would be more finikey to find a good load for...but i will find that out soon enough. i also crimped this last batch even tho they didn't have canelure, but hopefully i won't notice as many fliers. i'm really gonna try to exersice some better trigger control too. honestly tho, i'm thinking for shooting targets it would be nice to have a selectable gas block and jst turn off the gas and cycle each round by hand.....H, that maybe someting you could put together pretty easily and i know that would be a good plus if i ever got a piston system.
    I have a query out to HTR on new (prep'd) brass vs. used, as all of my used is currently loaded waiting for range time. I will get some data to you in Max. of a week. I am going to use HTR's set up of 2.30 COAL, 115 SMK, and 28.5 gr. of H322. I think he was getting in the neighborhood of 26XX fps. but for range/trigger training that is fine with me. It will be interesting to see what size groups I get with this set up.
    Mike Moore
    N5RWH
    NRA# 166336949


 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •